HR Police PC · General Reasoning and Mental Aptitude
Syllogism
Two-statement deductions using all/some/no quantifiers.
Test yourself on Syllogism
5 real HR Police PC questions with instant answers — no signup, ~3 minutes.
Study notes are still being prepared.
Don't wait — Shishya can teach you this topic right now, on demand.
Ask Shishya to teach this →Need more? Ask Shishya
Shishya is your personal tutor for this topic. Pick a starter or open a free chat.
- Go deeper on this topicGo deeper on Syllogism for HR Police PC — examples and edge cases I should know.
- Show me exam shortcutsGive me 3 fastest shortcuts to solve Syllogism questions in the exam.
- What mistakes should I avoid?What are the most common mistakes students make on Syllogism? How do I avoid them?
- Quiz me adaptivelyQuiz me on Syllogism — start with one easy question, then go harder based on how I answer.
Practice this topic
Take a full mock →Q1 · Syllogism · EASY
Statements: 1. All books are pens. 2. All pens are pencils. Conclusions: I. All books are pencils. II. Some pencils are books. Which conclusion logically follows?
Q2 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: 1. Some doctors are engineers. 2. No engineer is a teacher. Conclusions: I. Some doctors are not teachers. II. No doctor is a teacher. Which conclusion logically follows?
Q3 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: 1. All mobiles are computers. 2. Some computers are laptops. Conclusions: I. Some mobiles are laptops. II. Some laptops are mobiles. Which conclusion logically follows?
Q4 · Syllogism · HARD
Statements: 1. No policeman is a criminal. 2. All criminals are liars. 3. Some liars are corrupt. Conclusions: I. No policeman is a liar. II. Some corrupt persons are criminals. Which conclusion logically follows?
Q5 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: All pens are books. Some books are tables. Conclusions: I. Some pens are tables. II. All tables are books. Which conclusion logically follows?