Delhi Police PC · Reasoning Ability
Syllogism
Logical conclusions from premises.
Test yourself on Syllogism
5 real Delhi Police PC questions with instant answers — no signup, ~3 minutes.
Study notes are still being prepared.
Don't wait — Shishya can teach you this topic right now, on demand.
Ask Shishya to teach this →Need more? Ask Shishya
Shishya is your personal tutor for this topic. Pick a starter or open a free chat.
- Go deeper on this topicGo deeper on Syllogism for Delhi Police PC — examples and edge cases I should know.
- Show me exam shortcutsGive me 3 fastest shortcuts to solve Syllogism questions in the exam.
- What mistakes should I avoid?What are the most common mistakes students make on Syllogism? How do I avoid them?
- Quiz me adaptivelyQuiz me on Syllogism — start with one easy question, then go harder based on how I answer.
Practice this topic
Take a full mock →Q1 · Syllogism · EASY
Statements: 1. All books are pens. 2. All pens are papers. Conclusions: I. All books are papers. II. Some papers are books. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?
Q2 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: 1. Some mangoes are apples. 2. All apples are bananas. Conclusions: I. Some mangoes are bananas. II. All bananas are mangoes. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?
Q3 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: 1. No cat is a dog. 2. Some dogs are animals. Conclusions: I. Some animals are not cats. II. All cats are animals. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?
Q4 · Syllogism · HARD
Statements: 1. All chairs are tables. 2. No table is a door. 3. Some doors are windows. Conclusions: I. No chair is a door. II. Some windows are not tables. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?
Q5 · Syllogism · EASY
Statements: All teachers are scholars. Some scholars are researchers. Conclusions: I. Some teachers are researchers. II. All scholars are teachers. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?