Home · Colleges · Placements

Reading college placement data honestly

Indian college placement marketing is famously misleading. "₹2 Cr highest CTC!", "100% placement!", "Top recruiters Google + MS!". These are technically true and decision-useless. Here's how to read them.

Honest median packages — top tiers

Median = middle 50%. Not "highest", not "average" (which is skewed by outliers). Sources: published placement reports cross-checked with student forums (Pagalguy, Quora, anonymous IIM placement spreadsheets).

6 misleading patterns to ignore

Questions to actually ask

  1. What's the median CTC? Not average. Not highest. Median.
  2. What's the median for MY branch? CSE median ≠ Mechanical median.
  3. How many got offers from top product / consulting / IB / govt? Not just "logos visited" — actual offer count.
  4. What % of students sat for placements? If 30% opted out, "100% placed of 70%" is the real number — not 100%.
  5. What's the bottom decile CTC? If lowest-decile gets ₹3 LPA service offers, that's the floor.
  6. Is the foreign offer ₹2 Cr included in the average? Should be excluded for honest comparison.
  7. Where do alumni 5 years out work? The most-honest signal. LinkedIn search for "[college] [batch year]".
  8. What's the salary 5 years out — not just at graduation? Some tier-3 BTech grads start at ₹3.5L but reach ₹15L in 5 years. Some IIT grads start at ₹30L but plateau if they don't switch firms.

What Shishya publishes vs not

We publish:

  • Median ranges from official college placement reports (where available)
  • NIRF Graduation Outcomes score (with caveats — see our insights article)
  • Cross-links to colleges' own placement reports (which you should read)
  • Career-path-level salary bands (in /careers)

We deliberately don't publish:

  • "Highest CTC" numbers — they're decision-useless
  • "100% placement" claims without context
  • College rankings based on placement alone (use NIRF + multiple signals)